MSCHE Self-Study
Accreditation is a process by which colleges and universities are evaluated by an external organization to determine if they meet certain standards of quality. These standards may relate to the institution's academic programs, faculty, facilities, and financial stability.
There are several reasons why institutions of higher education are required to be accredited:
- Quality assurance: Accreditation helps ensure that institutions of higher education meet certain standards of quality. This helps students and their families know that they are getting a high-quality education that will prepare them for their future careers.
- Eligibility for federal financial aid: In order to be eligible to receive federal financial aid, such as grants and loans, institutions of higher education must be accredited by an organization recognized by the U.S. Department of Education. This helps ensure that students are receiving financial aid to attend institutions that meet certain standards of quality.
- Transferability of credits: Accreditation helps ensure that credits earned at one institution will be recognized and accepted by other institutions. This is important for students who may want to transfer credits from one institution to another or who may want to pursue a graduate degree after completing their undergraduate studies.
Salem Community College received reaffirmation of accreditation in 2016 and expects to earn reaffirmation by the conclusion of the 2025 academic year.
Ken Robell | Vice President of Academic Affairs, Accreditation Liaison Officer, Core Steering Committee Co-Chair, Standard 3 & 5 Co-Chair | Ken Robell was appointed Vice President in 2022 after working in administration and faculty at the college. He played key roles in simplifying placement of new students into college level courses and redesigning developmental math and English. His support for expansion of Nursing, Scientific Glass Technology, and high school partnerships strengthened enrollment at the college. |
Jennifer Martin | Faculty, Core Steering Committee Co-Chair, Standard 6 Co-Chair | Since joining SCC in 2012, Professor Martin’s major accomplishments include streamlining the developmental English sequence to include a highly-effective co-requisite course and chairing the Outcomes Assessment Committee for two two-year terms. During SCC’s previous Self-Study, Professor Martin served as Co-Chair of several standards. She has also served as a MSCHE peer-evaluator for SUNY Schenectady County Community College in 2019 and Garrett College in 2020. |
Ron Burkhardt | Assistant Dean of IRP, Core Steering Committee Chair | Ron Burkhardt currently serves as the Assistant Dean for Institutional Research and Planning. Since joining SCC in 2013 he has served in a variety of capacities and facilitated several grants, projects, research, and improvement related activities. Throughout his 20 years of higher education experience he has worked in residential housing, information technology, financial aid, workforce development, grants, and institutional research and planning. |
Kelly Schimpf | Dean of Student Services, Co-Chair Standard 4 | Since joining Salem Community College in 2012, Kelly Schimpf has held a variety of roles in both Student Services and Academic Affairs, and currently serves as the Dean of Enrollment Management & Student Services and Title IX Coordinator. During her time at SCC Kelly has championed the adoption and expansion of technology solutions to support the student experience, and expanded local high school partnerships and programs. Kelly previously participated on a working group during the last Self-Study. |
Amy Bennis-Kimball | Director of Admissions, Co-Chair Standard 4 | Amy Bennis-Kimball serves as Salem Community College’s Director of Admissions and Title IX Deputy Coordinator for (Students). Since joining SCC in 2021, she has contributed to the student experience through collaborative DEI initiatives (GLSEN Day of Silence, Preferred Name/Pronoun implementation) and technology adaptation (online appointment scheduling, Admissions chatbot). Throughout her 20 years in higher education advising and program coordination, she has supported MSCHE, NCATE and Title II accreditation efforts at various institutions. |
Howard Valentine | Faculty, Co-Chair Standard 4 | Howard Valentine is Associate Professor of Mathematics. He has been instructing SCC for over 23 years. He teaches at the developmental course level through Precalculus. Prof. Valentine headed the first co-requisite enhancement type Math Courses at SCC. These were derived from best practices in the state of NJ to aid identified students to achieve success in the associated College Level Math Course. |
Rod Jefferson | Chief Financial Officer, Co-Chair Standard 6 | Chief Financial Officer Rodney Jefferson's experience includes accounting, finance, auditing, budgeting and strategic planning. Prior to his appointment at SCC, Rod was Director of Finance and Administration/CFO/Comptroller for the Newark (N.J.) Public Library. He planned, directed and controlled all functions of the finance department, including general/fund accounting, purchasing, budgeting, cash management, information technology, payroll, accounts payable and facilities, overseeing 55 professionals. |
Dr. Terri Covello | Director of Nursing, Co-Chair Standard 6 | Since joining Salem Community College in December 2019, Dr. Covello’s main accomplishments include increasing nursing student enrollment and successfully overseeing the Spring 2022 Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing (ACEN) accreditation for the Associate Degree Nursing program. Dr. Covello is a current member of Associate Degree Nursing Council and serves as a member of the Salem Medical Center (Inspira Health Affiliate) Nurse Residence Advisory Board. Dr. Covello has served as a peer evaluator for ACEN twice a year since 2017. |
Maura Cavanagh Dick | Associate Dean of Academic Affairs, Co-Chair Standard 1, 2 & 7 | Maura Cavanagh Dick serves as Associate Dean of Academic Affairs, Title IX Deputy Coordinator (Academic Affairs), and Chair of the DEI Committee. Since joining the College in 2006, she has made many curricular contributions to the Biological and Health Science programs, serving as an Associate Professor of Biology, and during SCC’s previous Self Study, she served as the co-chair of the Self Study Steering Committee. |
Bill Clark | Director of Public Affairs, Alumni and Outreach, Co-Chair Standard 1, 2 & 7 | Bill Clark is Director of Public Relations, Community Outreach and Alumni Affairs. Currently SCC’s longest-serving administrator, Clark facilitates the College’s many special events with K-12, government and business partners. His writing and management skills also support the College’s International Flameworking Conference, Commencement and Gala. Clark serves as the College’s public information officer, a role that was especially critical during the pandemic. |
Jenna Lucente | Faculty, Co-Chair Standard 1, 2 & 7 | Jenna Lucente is an Associate Professor of Art at Salem Community college who brings real world experience into the classroom. Recent artistic accomplishments for this artist include a permanent public art installation at the Arthur Kill Station in Staten Island NY (MTA), and upcoming, a permanent public art installation at the Elizabeth Station in Elizabeth, New Jersey (NJTransit). Jenna also was recently co-curator of a large contemporary glass exhibit at The Delaware Contemporary where over 30 artists were on display across 7,000 sq. feet of gallery space. |
Kristin Deady | Assistant Dean of Glass Education, Co-Chair Standard 3 & 5 | Kristin Deady serves as Assistant Dean in Glass Education at SCC. Since arriving at SCC in 2016 she has strengthened the educational and employment opportunities for students enrolled in the college’s glass focused degree programs. She has expanded the offerings of the college’s glass center to include a variety of non-credit glass workshops and events. Kristin was a key partner in the development of, and move to, SCC’s new 20,000 sq. ft. state-of-the-art glass center in 2019. |
Professor Mays | Faculty, Co-Chair Standard 3 & 5 | Professor Mays has been a member of the faculty since 2001 teaching Mathematics. Along with teaching, he is a faculty academic advisor and Phi Theta Kappa honor society chapter advisor. Professor Mays has served on several MSCHE committees throughout the last two Self-studies. |
Standards and Chapters | 4. Support of the Student Experience | 6. Planning, Resources, Institutional Improvement | ||
Linked Requirements of Affiliation | 3, 4 | 10, 11 | 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14 | 9, 15 |
Strategic Plan Link | INCREASE EDUC ATTAIN | COLLEGE OF CHOICE | OPPORTUNITY ENGINE | IMPROVE SUCCESS |
Executive Co-Chair | Kelly Schimpf | Rod Jefferson | Maura Cavanagh-Dick | Ken Robell |
Faculty Co-Chair | Howard Valentine | Jennifer Martin | Jenna Lucente | William Mays |
Staff Co-Chair | Amy Bennis-Kimball | Terri Covello | Bill Clark | Kristin Deady |
Workgroup Members - actively supporting committee and co-chairs | Laura Green Joe Pritchett Irma Aguirre Heather Stith Cal Cizek Bob Bunnell Faculty | Larry McKee Lynn McCosker Ryan Danner Mary Eklund Noah McFadden Charles Erhardt Faculty | Maria Fantini Brian Marsh Jill James Katelyn Good Faculty | Jennifer Pierce Lauren Schwartz Faculty |
Key Contributors – support workgroup as required | Terrence DeLane Marissa Stanko John Holt Wendy Decker Sonia Bermudez Anetha Perry Bonnie Rivera | Adrienne Muscemi Janette Irizzary Kevin Blair Lena Doumenis | Mike Gorman Dave Kelk Stacy Brown Alicia Smith Bruce Watkins Joe Henderson Chuck Weigle | Rosemma Ward Doug Ohm Nick Simmon Mickey McAllister Mary Eklund Anna Manogue |
Institutional Overview
Salem Community College (SCC) is an accredited, co-educational, public two-year institution of higher education. SCC was established by the Salem County Board of Chosen Freeholders in 1972. It is authorized by the New Jersey Office of the Secretary of Higher Education to grant associate degrees (Associate in Arts, Associate in Fine Arts, Associate in Science, and Associate in Applied Science) and certificates – both credit certificates (30-36 credits) and career certificates (less than 30 credits) in over 35 programs of study. Many of these programs transfer to four-year colleges and universities. SCC is governed by a Board of Trustees comprised of the Executive Superintendent of Schools of Salem County, eight members appointed by the Salem County Board of Commissioners, two members appointed by the governor, and one alumni representative elected by the student body.
SCC is one of eighteen community colleges in the state of New Jersey and is in a small town in Salem County, which is in the southwestern corner of the state, bordering Delaware and southeastern Pennsylvania. The College is 10 miles from Wilmington, Delaware, 35 miles from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and 71 miles from Atlantic City, New Jersey. Salem County is the oldest and least densely populated county in New Jersey and is the among the poorest county per capita. In addition, some of the largest employers in the county have undergone tremendous change and downsizing.
SCC experienced several years of enrollment declines until 2019 when the trend reversed. The College has continued modest enrollment growth even during the COVID pandemic. This growth was the result of deliberate investments to expand specific programs including athletics and nursing.
The College was first awarded accreditation by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education in 1979, and was reaffirmed in 1984, 1990, 1995, 2005, and 2016.
SCC welcomed Dr. Michael Gorman as its eighth President in August 2015. Dr. Gorman was selected after a national search and comes to the College with a strong commitment to both education and the Salem County community.[JM3]
Academic Programs
SCC offers Academic Programs for college credit, and these programs can be sorted into three categories. The categories are Nursing/Health Science, Glass, and traditional Liberal Arts/Social Sciences/Business. The college cultivates partnerships with area high schools to attract more students to pursue post-secondary education and to offer opportunities to earn college credit before high school graduation.
The Nursing and Health Science programs enroll the largest number of students at SCC. The Health Science program awards graduates an Associate in Science degree and articulates with Stockton University and Rutgers University-Camden. This program teaches students about the diverse opportunities to pursue a career in Health Professions.
However, most students matriculated in Health Science intend to apply to one of SCC’s Nursing Programs. The Practical Nursing Certificate program admits students with little or no previous experience in health care into a 44-week program involving classroom, laboratory, and clinical instruction. This program is accredited by the New Jersey Board of Nursing and prepares students to take the National Council for Licensing Examination for Practical Nursing (NCLEX-PN). The Nursing Associate in Applied Science degree enrolls students who already hold a Practical Nursing license. These students complete a one-year program to prepare to become Registered Nurses by taking the NCLEX-RN.
A completely unique academic department at SCC consists of the Glass Education Center (GEC) housing two programs of study focused on Glass. The Associate in Applied Science degree in Scientific Glass Technology (SGT) prepares students to make custom laboratory apparatus from glass. Graduates find employment in research departments at universities and a wide variety of manufacturing companies. The SGT program is the only formal instruction in this field offered in North America. The GEC also houses the Associate in Fine Arts degree in Glass Art. Students in the Glass Art program can transfer to study for their bachelor degree at Alfred University or the Tyler School of Art at Temple University, among others.
SCC also offers the most popular post-secondary degrees. These degrees in Liberal Arts, Business Administration (both Associate in Science and Associate in Applied Science), Social Sciences, Biology/Chemistry, and Visual Art prepare students to transfer and earn their bachelor's degrees. SCC’s largest transfer partners are Rowan University and Wilmington University.
The College has cultivated strong partnerships with high schools and developed a variety of dual-enrollment programs. Several high schools align their curricula with the College to qualify courses at the high school for college credit. Four county high schools permit their students to attend classes at the college to meet their graduation requirements. Every year, a few high school students complete enough college credits to earn their associate degrees before graduating from high school.
Milestones Since Last Self-Study
Significant milestones achieved since the prior Middle States Self-Study over the past 10-years (2014-2023) include:
- Maintaining high retention and graduation rates
- New Glass Center
- Expansion of Nursing programs
- Expansion of high school partnerships
- Return of Athletics
- Expansion of EOF (Educational Opportunity Fund)
- Digital learning enhancements – online materials in all classes
- Focus on student health & wellness
Mission, Vision, Values, Institutional Priorities
The College’s 2020-2025 Strategic Plan incorporated an inclusive process started in 2019 that resulted in a revised Mission, Vision, Values, and Goals accompanied by a Diversity and Independence statement. Less than half of high school graduates in Salem county pursue any kind of postsecondary education, so the College adopted increasing educational attainment as one goal. While SCC already boasts one of the highest graduation rates among community colleges in New Jersey, the strategic planning process recognized the need to continue to increase success for all student groups. This focus was therefore adopted as an institutional goal. SCC also recognized its role as a key institution in Salem county and the need to take a leadership role to improve life for its residents. As the leading public institution in the county, SCC does so much more than offer economical and high-quality academic programs, so the goal to act as the county opportunity engine was adopted. This role could not be successfully attained unless SCC strives for excellence in all actions and builds a reputation for high quality. Thus, the college adopted the goal to be the college of choice for every service provided. These four goals became the core of the current Strategic Plan.
Mission: Your Salem Community College is the education epicenter providing personalized, affordable, quality, and empowering education for transfer and workforce.
Vision: Salem Community College is the leading, innovative, educational, and convening resource committed to enhancing and assuring the prosperity of Salem County’s residents, industry, and government.
Independence Statement: Your Salem Community College, as an independent institution, is the educational epicenter, cultural soul, and business facilitator of Salem County. We can best serve the uniqueness of Salem County and deliver personalized attention to our students and citizens as Salem Community College.
Diversity Statement: Salem Community College recognizes its responsibility and commitment to foster an environment of respect, and understanding among all individuals and groups, with sensitivity for those likely to experience disrespect, abuse and misunderstanding because of race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, age, economic status, or mental or physical challenges.
Values:
Excellence: Maintain a high standard of performance leading to the achievement of academic and professional goals.
Integrity: Behave ethically and trustworthy in all interactions at all levels.
Personalized: Understand that each person is an individual with unique trials, goals, and aspirations.
Success: Commit to achieving the academic and professional goals that lead to personal growth and prosperity.
Equity: Foster a learning community which values the individual needs of all students in all cultures and lifestyles.
Innovation: Keep pace with global trends, academic technology, and higher education practice to prepare students for success in the workplace.
Collaboration: Seek input from all sectors of the college, members of the community, and our academic peers.
Institutional Goals:
GOAL#1: Increase educational attainment of degrees and credentials leading to secure careers for Salem County residents.
GOAL2#: To be the College of Choice through a personalized experience for students, residents, staff, faculty, partners, industry, and government.
GOAL#3: To be the educational, economic, cultural opportunity engine for Salem County.
GOAL#4: Significantly improve success for ALL students in terms of accessibility, diversity, civility, and equity. All means all.
Institutional Priorities to Be Addressed in the Self-Study
The Institutional Goals listed in the previous section map to the Standards of Accreditation . Because of this close alignment, the Institutional Goals from the Strategic Plan will also be the Institutional Priorities addressed in this Self-Study. These priorities evolved from work during the previous strategic plan term. While much progress was made previously, stakeholders recognized the need to continuously improve upon these priorities and expand work in these areas.
The timing of the Self-Study affords SCC the ability to concurrently examine how the College has achieved these goals. The results of this examination will provide input into the next Strategic Plan.
Crosswalk of MSCHE Standards to Institutional Priorities | Institutional Priority 1: Increase Educational Attainment | Institutional Priority 2: Be the College of Choice | Institutional Priority 3: Serve as the Opportunity Engine | Institutional Priority 4: Improve Student Success |
Standard I - Mission and Goals | Indirect | Direct | Direct | Indirect |
Standard II - Ethics and Integrity | Indirect | Direct | Indirect | Indirect |
Standard III - Design and Delivery of the Student Learning Experience | Direct | Indirect | Indirect | Direct |
Standard IV - Support of the Student Experience | Direct | Direct | Direct | Direct |
Standard V - Educational Effectiveness Assessment | Direct | Indirect | Direct | Direct |
Standard V - Educational Effectiveness Assessment | Indirect | Direct | Direct | Indirect |
Standard VI - Planning, Resources, and Institutional Improvement | Indirect | Direct | Indirect | Indirect |
Standard VII - Governance, Leadership, and Administration |
Intended Outcomes of the Self-Study
- Salem Community College intends to achieve four outcomes during the Self-Study process. These intended outcomes are:
- Reaffirmation – the Self-Study shall demonstrate how Salem Community College currently meets the Commission’s Standards for Accreditation and Requirements of Affiliation.
- Engagement - the Self-Study process shall engage the institutional community in an inclusive and transparent self-appraisal process that actively and deliberately seeks to involve members from all areas of the institution.
- Continuous improvement – the Self–Study shall recognize achievements and successes so these strengths can be leveraged for further growth, while also identifying areas in need of improvement to be addressed.
- Planning – the Self-Study shall provide input for the College’s next Strategic Plan.
Crosswalk of Intended Outcomes and Institutional Priorities | Strategic Priority 1: Increase Educational Attainment | Strategic Priority 2: Be the College of Choice | Strategic Priority 3: Serve as the Opportunity Engine | Strategic Priority 4: Improve Student Success |
I. Reaffirmation | Direct | Direct | Indirect | Direct |
II. Inclusive Process | Indirect | Direct | Indirect | Indirect |
III. Continuous Improvement | Direct | Indirect | Direct | Direct |
IV. Input for Next Strategic Plan | Direct | Direct | Direct | Direct |
Self-Study Approach
Salem Community College is using a Standards-Based Approach to organize the Self-Study Report. The institutional goals in the current College Strategic Plan generally align with the Standards of Accreditation. This alignment should facilitate presentation of the Self-Study using the Standards-Based Approach.
Organizational Structure of the Steering Committee and Working Groups
Salem Community College appointed a Leadership Team to oversee and coordinate the Self-Study process. The members of the Leadership Team also act as Co-Chairs of the Steering Committee. The areas of expertise represented by the Leadership Team will ensure the Self-Study process is organized, efficient, and inclusive. The Leadership Team will also be charged with ensuring the Self-Study is clearly written and evidence is accessible and presented in an organized manner.
Leadership Team and Co-Chairs of the Steering Committee | |
Ken Robell | Vice President of Academic Affairs, Chief Academic Officer, and Accreditation Liaison Officer |
Jennifer Martin | Associate Professor of English |
Ron Burkhardt | Assistant Dean of Institutional Research & Planning |
Steering Committee and Working Group Tri-Chairs
The Steering Committee is comprised of executive leaders, staff, and faculty in equal numbers. Recruitment for the Steering Committee involved soliciting volunteers and matching those who volunteered with Standards that fit with their interests and areas of expertise.
The Steering Committee members also act as Chairs of the Working Groups. Each Working Group has a member of the executive staff as one of the Tri-Chairs to ensure that adequate resources and support are available. These executive staff members will also work together to reduce duplicative efforts.
SCC organized four Working Groups to cover the seven Standards. Tri-Chairs of each Working Group will recruit Working Group members who have relevant knowledge in relation to each Standard. Working Group members will include faculty and staff who represent all areas of the College.
Four Working Groups | Steering Committee Members and Working Group Tri-Chairs |
Standard I: Mission and Goals Standard II: Ethics and Integrity Standard VII: Governance, Leadership, and Administration | Maura Cavanagh Dick, Associate Dean of Academic Affairs |
Bill Clark, Director of Public Relations | |
Jenna Lucente, Associate Professor of Visual and Performing Art | |
Standard III: Design and Delivery of the Student Learning Experience Standard V: Educational Effectiveness Assessment | Ken Robell, Vice President of Academic Affairs |
Kristin Deady, Associate Dean of Glass Education | |
William Mays, Associate Professor of Mathematics | |
Standard IV: Support of the Student Experience | Kelly Schimpf, Dean of Student Services |
Amy Bennis-Kimball, Director of Admissions | |
Howard Valentine, Associate Professor of Mathematics | |
Standard VI: Planning, Resources, and Institutional Improvement | Rod Jefferson, Chief Financial Officer |
Dr. Theresa Covello, Director of Nursing | |
Jennifer Martin, Associate Professor of English |
The Steering Committee is charged with leading the Self-Study process. Specifically, the Steering Committee will:
- Understand the Standards of Accreditation and their mapping to Institutional Priorities.
- Develop Lines of Inquiry.
- Lead and coordinate Working Groups.
- Stay on schedule in accordance with the Self-Study timeline outlined in section IX of this Self-Study Design report.
- Collect documentation for the Evidence Inventory.
- Draft and revise chapter reports for the Self-Study.
Each Working Group will have Tri-Chairs from the Steering Committee for leadership and coordination. The Working Groups will:
- Become acquainted with the Self-Study Design.
- Understand the Standards of Accreditation and their mapping to the Institutional Priorities.
- Provide evidence of compliance with the Requirements of Affiliation.
- Investigate the Lines of Inquiry in the context of the Standards of Accreditation and the College’s mission and goals.
- Identify strengths and opportunities for improvement as part of their investigation.
- Develop a repository of supporting documents for all assertions regarding the Lines of Inquiry.
- Assist in the drafting and revising of chapter reports for the Self-Study.
Standard I: Mission and Goals | Institutional Priority | |
1. | What is the process for developing the mission, vision, and strategic planning goals of the College, and is this process inclusive, transparent, and regularly assessed? | 2 |
2. | How does the College determine progress toward achieving the mission and strategic planning goals, and how is this progress communicated? | 2 |
3. | What evidence demonstrates that the mission and goals of the College drive academic and administrative decision making? | 2 and 3 |
4. | Are the mission, vision, and strategic goals relevant, forward thinking (innovative), and achievable? | 2 |
Standard II: Ethics and Integrity Research Questions | Institutional Priority | |
1. | How is a culture of inclusivity, belonging, and respect fostered for all members of the College community? | 2 |
2. | How does the College document, address, and review student and employee grievances to ensure appropriate, equitable, and compliant outcomes? | 2 |
3. | How does the College communicate to current and prospective students the affordability and value of attending SCC? | 2 |
4. | How does the College maintain accountability in all applicable areas of regulatory compliance? | 2 |
5. | What evidence demonstrates that the College recruits and retains qualified faculty and staff that represent the diversity of the students it serves? | 2 |
6. | What evidence demonstrates that the College is committed to fair, equitable, and impartial personnel practices? | 2 |
Standard III: Design and Delivery of the Student Learning Experience | Institutional Priority | |
1. | How does the College ensure quality and achievement of student learning outcomes across all course delivery modalities? | 4 |
2. | How does the College’s curriculum reflect cultural sensitivity and global and cultural awareness? | 4 |
3. | How does the College provide sufficient learning experiences to support students’ programs of study and academic success? | 1 and 4 |
Standard IV: Support of the Student Experience | Institutional Priority | |
1. | How does the College provide accurate and comprehensive information regarding expenses, financial aid, scholarships, grants, loans, repayment, and refunds to current and prospective students? | 2 |
2. | How does the College recruit and provide orientation to new students to promote academic success? | 2 |
3. | How does the College effectively identify academically at-risk students and connect them to appropriate resources? | 4 |
4. | How does the College provide programming and resources to support the physical, emotional, social, intellectual, environmental, spiritual, vocational, and financial wellness of students? | 4 |
5. | How does the College support historically underserved student populations? | 1, 2, and 4 |
6. | How does the College support the unique needs of student athletes? | 4 |
Standard V: Educational Effectiveness Assessment | Institutional Priority | |
1. | How does the College assess student learning outcomes across academic programs? | 4 |
2. | How does the College use educational effectiveness assessment data for continuous improvement? | 4 |
3. | How does the College use information from advisory committees and program reviews to validate program objectives and continuously improve? | 4 |
4. | What resources does the College provide for students and faculty to assist in attaining student learning outcomes? | 4 |
Standard VI: Planning, Resources, and Institutional Improvement | Institutional Priority | |
1. | What is the process for developing the College budget, and how effective, inclusive, and transparent is this process? | 2 |
2. | How is the College’s financial planning and budgeting process assessed, and are the results of the assessment used to improve this process? | 2 |
3. | To what level are standard operational processes at the College documented, efficient, and consistently followed? | 2 |
4. | What evidence exists of long-term financial planning across units at the College to support institutional renewal, and how do these plans align with the College’s mission and strategic priorities? | 2 and 3 |
5. | Does the College have adequate personnel, facilities, and technology to support and sustain current operations and plan for the future? | 2 |
6. | How has the College acquired and used grant funding, and how was the use of these funds assessed to determine the impact on the College? | 1 and 3 |
Standard VII: Governance, Leadership, and Administration | Institutional Priority | |
1. | How does the administration effectively communicate decision-making and organizational changes to students, employees, and other stakeholders? | 2 |
2. | How effective and inclusive is the College’s governance structure, and how often is the governance structure assessed? | 2 |
3. | How does the College determine the effectiveness of administrative units and continue to improve? | 2 |
4. | What evidence exists that College policies are regularly reviewed with a focus on relevance and equity? | 1 and 2 |
5. | How does the College assess the effectiveness of the president and the Board of Trustees in alignment with the College’s mission and goals, and what evidence exists for succession planning for each? | 2 |
Guidelines for Reporting
Working Group Progress Reports
Working Groups will follow the Self-Study Timetable in section IX and the Communication Plan in section X of this Self-Study Design document and will regularly report progress during bimonthly Steering Committee meetings. Each Working Group will be responsible for producing the following:
- Drafts of Lines of Inquiry for each Standard
- Preliminary lists of evidence
- Chapter Report outlines
- Rough drafts of Chapter Reports, including any tables and figures
- Revised drafts of Chapter Reports
- Final Chapter Report(s)
Working Groups will use a dedicated Middle States Teams site in Microsoft SharePoint to create and save all files related to their Chapter Reports. All writing will be done collaboratively in Microsoft SharePoint and no files shall be edited off-line. Steering Committee Chairs will frequently check on progress of Chapter Report drafts and will offer assistance as needed.
Working Group Final Reports Template
Chapter Reports shall be organized as follows:
- General statement of the Standard for Accreditation
- Brief description of “point in time” (current issues, situations, trends, etc.) in relation to the Standard
- Narrative of analysis and evidence in relation to specific lines of inquiry with appropriate references to Standards, Requirements for Affiliation, and cross-references to other chapters within the Self-Study
- Findings and conclusions
- Recommendations for improvement
Editorial Guidelines and Style Guide
Editors have been chosen to ensure that SCC’s Self Study is written in a unified voice. The editors are members of the Core Leadership Team and will work closely with all committee members.
Format
MLA style guidelines will be followed for all content; committee members should adhere to that style when preparing documents. Below are a few common elements:
- Microsoft Word
- 1-inch margins
- 12-point font, Times New Roman
- Left justified
- Single spaced
- One space between sentences
- MLA format for citations
- Italics for titles of publications (e.g., SCC College Catalog)
- Double-space between paragraphs
- Major headings should be left-justified in bold, upper and lower case, 14 pt, with two spaces after
- Center tables on the page; single space, left justify content. Tables should be labeled and numbered with the table number,
- Standard number, and title (e.g. Table 1: Standard I: Title). Tables, charts, and other figures should be listed in the Table of Contents.
- Page numbers should be in the footer of each page
- Maximum length of Chapter Reports: 12 pages
Style Guidelines
- Refer to Salem Community College by its full name, SCC, or the College.
- Write in the active voice, use present tense and third person. (e.g., The number of faculty at the College has decreased.)
- Percent: Use % with numerals (e.g.: 50%) Spell out the word percent when used without numbers.
- Use month/date/year format for dates (January 1, 2021), including a comma after the year within a sentence. Do not use ordinal numbers. (e.g.: Do not write “January 1st, 2021.)
- Use the MS Word default format for bulleted or numbered lists.
- Refer to positions or titles, rather than individuals’ names.
- Avoid excessive use of jargon.
- Do not use contractions.
- List names in alphabetical order.
- When creating a bulleted list, use punctuation.
- Spell out 0-9; use numerals for 10 and over.
- Use Working Group to refer to Standards Working Group(s).
- Use roman numerals to refer to the Standards.
- When using acronyms, introduce the acronym in parentheses after the first use of the full term in each section of the document. List acronyms in an end-of-chapter appendix. They will be compiled at the end of the final document. Avoid overuse.
- Program, General Education, Course, or Student Learning Outcomes may be referred to as their abbreviations after defining the term.
- When the Middle States Self-Study specifies or refers to “Institutional Priorities,” it refers to the College’s Strategic Plan Goals.
Capitalization
- Names of Middle States Self-Study groups (such as Steering Committee, Team Leads, etc.)
- Self-Study Design / SCC’s Self-Study
- Institutional Priorities
- Standards for Accreditation, Requirements of Affiliation
- Job titles
- Capitalize and italicize institutional documents and processes (e.g., Strategic Plan, SLOA Handbook, etc.)
- Capitalize the word college only if a proper noun (Salem Community College) or if the use of College specifically references Salem Community College.
- Use formal names for named buildings and spaces (Tillis Green or Donaghay Building)
- Fall and spring are not capitalized within text.
Organization of the Final Self-Study Report
Self-Study Report Outline
Executive summary
Chapter 1: Introduction
- Brief overview of Salem Community College, including its mission and strategic priorities, programs, student characteristics, connections in the community, and current strengths and weaknesses
- Description of the Self-Study process
Chapter 2: Standard I: Mission and Goals
- General statement of the Standard for Accreditation
- Brief description of “point in time” (current issues, situations, trends, etc.) in relation to the Standard
- Narrative of analysis and evidence in relation to specific lines of inquiry with appropriate references to the Standard,
- Requirements for Affiliation, and cross-references to other chapters within the Self-Study
- Findings and conclusions
- Recommendations for improvement
Note: Chapters 3 through 8 will follow the same outline as Chapter 2
Chapter 3: Standard II: Ethics and Integrity
Chapter 4: Standard III: Design and Delivery of the Student Learning Experience
Chapter 5: Standard IV: Support of the Student Experience
Chapter 6: Standard V: Educational Effectiveness and Assessment
Chapter 7: Standard VI: Planning, Resources, and Institutional Improvement
Chapter 8: Standard VII: Governance, Leadership, and Administration
Chapter 9: Conclusion with final recommendations
Appendices
Each working group has responsibility for the Verification of Compliance in their associated Standard. This work will be coordinated through the Institutional Research and Planning department. Campus departments, staff, and faculty may be called on to address elements of compliance. Tri-Chairs will communicate via the Steering Committee process by email, phone, and in-person meetings where necessary.
As part of this inquiry Working Groups will:
- Review MSCHE Verification of Compliance with Accreditation-Relevant Federal Regulations;
- Collect documentation for all areas where MSCHE require verification of institutional compliance;
- Collect documentation of compliance for Requirements of Affiliation (#1-6 and #14);
- Submit SCC’s Report on Compliance with Accreditation-Relevant Federal Regulations the semester before the site visit;
- Review the institution’s Compliance Review Report from MSCHE to fulfill any request for additional information if needed.
The table below maps elements of the Requirements of Affiliation across the Standards and an encompassing compliance review. Each working group is expected to address the associated Requirements of Affiliation within their work and Lines of Inquiry. The Institutional Federal Compliance Report and any supporting evidence will be uploaded as evidence under Standard II, Criterion 8 as a single, bookmarked PDF.
Requirement of Affiliation | Evidence of Compliance | |
1. | Authorized to operate | Institutional Compliance Review |
2. | Institution is operational | Institutional Compliance Review |
3. | Graduating one class before accreditation | Institutional Compliance Review |
4. | Communicating with the Commission in English | Institutional Compliance Review |
5. | Compliance with governmental policies, regulations, and requirements | Institutional Compliance Review |
6. | Complying with Commission policies | Institutional Compliance Review |
7. | Mission and goals | Standard I |
8. | Systemic evaluation of all programs | Standard III, IV, V, VI |
9. | Student learning programs | Standard III, V |
10. | Institutional planning | Standard I, III, IV, V, VI |
11. | Financial resources | Standard VI |
12. | Governance structure | Standard VII |
13. | Governing board conflicts of interest | Standard VII |
14. | Governing board providing information | Institutional Compliance Review |
15. | A core of Faculty | Standard III |
Timetable Summary for Preparation for Self-Study Submission and Site Visit | |
LAY THE GROUNDWORK | |
Fall 2022 | President to appoint Co-Chairs of Self-Study Steering Committee. |
Fall 2022 | Co-Chairs attend virtual MSCHE Self-Study Institute. |
Dec 2022 | President and Co-Chairs to select a Self-Study model (Standards-based). |
Jan 2023 | Co-Chairs analyze gaps in completion of recommendations from 2016 Site Team Visit; Schedule campus visit by MSCHE Liaison Dr. Paul Starkey; Administrative Assistant to the President arranges for schedule and travel arrangements. |
DRAFT THE SELF -STUDY DESIGN | |
January 9, 2023 | Self-Study Steering Committee meets to review timetable for developing a draft of the Self-Study Design, including development of Lines of Inquiry for the Working Groups. |
January 10, 2023 | Co-Chairs introduce Steering Committee to College community at Opening Session and outline two-year process preparing for submission of Self-Study report to MSCHE. |
Late Jan-Mar 2023 | The Steering Committee meets regularly to complete Self-Study Design draft and compile the evidence inventory, identify evidence gaps, and review prior recommendations. Draft submitted for Presidential review and sent to Dr. Starkey. |
April 2023 | Dr. Starkey visits SCC to review and discuss Self-Study Design. |
April-May 2023 | Self-Study Steering Committee meets as needed to revise Self-Study Design draft, and final version is approved by College President and sent to Dr. Starkey for acceptance. |
May-June 2023 | Dr. Starkey accepts Self-Study Design on behalf of MSCHE. |
DRAFT THE SELF-STUDY | |
August 2023 | Co-Chairs kick off Self-Study research and drafting phase at Opening Session; Self-Study Steering Committee meets to review timetable for drafting Self-Study chapter reports for each Standard. |
Sep 2023 - Mar 2024 | Steering Committee meets regularly to oversee research and reporting by Working Groups, and Co-Chairs meet regularly with Working Group Co-Chairs to keep on track; Working Groups involve entire College community; Institutional Research and Planning (IR&P) to coordinate surveys and other data requests and organizes evidence inventory. |
January 2024 | Co-Chairs share update with College community at Opening Session. |
April 2024 | Co-Chairs share complete Self-Study draft with President and Executive Staff and incorporate feedback in draft to be shared with College community. |
May 2024 | Co-Chairs post complete Self-Study draft for comment from all internal stakeholders; President shares draft of Self-Study with Board of Trustees. |
July - Aug 2024 | Co-Chairs edit Self-Study and ensure HEOA compliance and all appendices are ready. |
Sep 2024 | President shares final draft of Self-Study with Board of Trustees for approval to submit to MSCHE and with Team Chair. |
Nov 2024 | College submits Self-Study to MSCHE. |
PREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT | |
Dec 2023 - Jan 2024 | MSCHE selects Site Visit Team Chair; President approves or denies the selection. |
Spring 2024 | President and Team Chair (once selected) select date for Team Chair’s preliminary visit to campus in Fall 2024 and potential dates for Site Visit in Spring 2025. College sends copy of the approved Self-Study Design to Team Chair. MSCHE selects other Site Visit Team members; President approves or denies the selection of each member. |
Fall 2024 | College sends current draft of Self-Study to Team Chair at least two weeks prior to Team Chair’s visit to campus. Team chair visits campus. |
Nov 2024 | College sends final draft of Self-Study to Team Chair. |
Dec 2024 | Administrative Assistant to the President arranges for schedule for site visit and travel arrangements for Site Visit Team members. |
Jan 2025 | College sends final version of Self-Study and Appendices to MSCHE and Site Visit Team members at least six weeks prior to Site Visit. |
Mar-April 2025 | Site Visit |
Salem Community College will provide frequent communication about its Self-Study process to ensure transparency and encourage involvement from all internal and external stakeholders. Communication about this process will occur in a variety of forms, including campus-wide assemblies, faculty and staff meetings, Board of Trustees meetings, forums and special events, bi-weekly newsletters (Campus Chronicles), updates on the website, and other electronic communications. Please see the table below for an overview of planned communication about the College’s pursuit for reaccreditation.
Semester | Audience | Communication Form and Purpose |
Spring 2023 | Self-Study Steering Committee and Working Groups | Bi-weekly meetings (in-person and virtual) to prepare Self-Study Design Updates posted in the Middle States Teams site in Office 365 SharePoint |
College community | College assemblies in January and March – Accreditation Liaison Officer (ALO) reviews MSCHE reaccreditation process Campus Chronicle newsletters – biweekly updates on the self-study process | |
Faculty (adjunct and FT) | Adjunct dinner in January – ALO provides overview of MSCHE reaccreditation process Monthly faculty meetings – Steering Committee Co-Chairs provide updates and solicit feedback from full-time faculty | |
Board of Trustees | Monthly BOT meetings – ALO provides updates about the Self-Study process and solicits feedback | |
College President and executive staff | Weekly executive staff meetings – ALO provides updates and solicits feedback from the College President and executive staff | |
Academic Senate members (faculty and staff) | Steering Committee Co-Chairs provide updates and solicit feedback from faculty and staff at monthly meetings | |
External audiences | Creation of Accreditation webpage on College website to inform the public about the College’s pursuit of reaccreditation and the Self-Study process | |
MSCHE Liaison | Self-Study Design draft is shared with MSCHE Liaison, and he visits campus to help prepare for the self-study process | |
Summer 2023 | Self-Study Steering Committee and Working Groups | Working Groups begin conducting research and analyzing evidence in preparation to draft Self-Study chapter reports; monthly updates provided to whole Steering Committee Updates posted in Middle States Teams site in Office 365 SharePoint |
College community | Campus Chronicle newsletters – biweekly updates on the self-study process | |
External audiences | Updates made to Accreditation webpage | |
Fall 2023 | Self-Study Steering Committee and Working Groups | Working Groups meet regularly (in-person and virtual) to conduct research, collect, and analyze evidence, and draft Self-Study chapter reports Updates on progress are shared in bi-weekly whole Steering Committee meetings and posted in the Middle States Teams site in SharePoint |
College community | Opening college assembly in August – Steering Committee Co-Chairs provide in-depth overview of Self-Study process and organize forums with specific Working Groups Professional development assembly in November – Steering Committee Co-Chairs provide update on Self-Study process and organize forums with Working Groups Campus Chronicle newsletters – biweekly updates on the Self-Study process | |
Faculty | Adjunct dinner in August – Steering Committee Co-Chairs provide update on Self-Study process and solicit input Monthly faculty meetings – Steering Committee Co-Chairs provide updates and solicit input from full-time faculty Teaching and Learning Center (TLC) workshops – professional development on topics related to the Self-Study | |
Board of Trustees | Monthly BOT meetings – ALO provides updates about the Self-Study process and solicits input | |
College President and executive staff | Weekly executive staff meetings – ALO provides updates and solicits input from the College President and executive staff | |
Academic Senate | Steering Committee Co-Chairs provide updates and solicit input from faculty and staff at monthly meetings | |
Students | Overview of MSCHE accreditation is provided in a flyer to students at New Student Orientation in August 2023 | |
External audiences | President’s vlog presents overview of SCC’s pursuit for MSCHE reaccreditation Monthly social media posts address aspects of reaccreditation process Updates made to Accreditation webpage | |
MSCHE Liaison | Communication exchanged regarding selection of Site Visit Team Chair | |
Spring 2024 | Self-Study Steering Committee and Working Groups | Working Groups meet regularly (in-person and virtual) to draft chapter reports for the Self-Study report. Working Groups submit drafts of chapter reports to Steering Committee Co-Chairs for feedback; complete draft of Self-Study is shared with entire Steering Committee by March 2024 |
College community | College assemblies in January and March – ALO shares updates on process of drafting Self-Study report; invites feedback on drafted sections Campus Chronicle newsletters – biweekly updates on the self-study process | |
Faculty | Adjunct dinner in January – ALO provides update on drafting the Self-Study report Monthly faculty meetings – Steering Committee Co-Chairs provide updates on Self-Study draft and solicit feedback from full-time faculty Teaching and Learning Center (TLC) workshops – professional development on topics related to the Self-Study | |
College President and executive staff | ALO shares drafts of the Self-Study report and solicits feedback from the College President and executive staff | |
Board of Trustees | College President shares complete draft of Self-Study report with BOT for their feedback at May 2024 meeting | |
Academic Senate | Steering Committee Co-Chairs share drafts of Self-Study report with faculty and staff and invites feedback | |
Students | Forums are held with students to invite feedback on Self-Study draft and process | |
External audiences | President’s vlog provides update on SCC’s pursuit for MSCHE reaccreditation Monthly social media posts continue to address reaccreditation process Updates made to Accreditation webpage Open house forum is held to solicit feedback from external stakeholders and general public | |
MSCHE and Site Visit Team Chair | ALO sends copy of approved Self-Study Design to Site Visit Team Chair President and Team Chair agree on schedule for site visit | |
Summer 2024 | Self-Study Steering Committee and Working Groups | Steering Committee Co-Chairs work on revisions to Self-Study draft and share updates with whole Steering Committee |
Fall 2024 | Self-Study Steering Committee and Working Groups | Steering Committee Co-Chairs share revised Self-Study report with whole Steering Committee and Working Groups |
College community | College assemblies in August and November – Steering Committee Co-Chairs share revised Self-Study report and provide update on reaccreditation process Campus Chronicle newsletters – biweekly updates on the self-study process | |
Faculty | Adjunct dinner in August – Steering Committee Co-Chairs share revised Self-Study report and provide update on reaccreditation process Monthly faculty meetings – Steering Committee Co-Chairs continue to provide updates on the reaccreditation process | |
College President and executive staff | ALO shares revised Self-Study report with College President and executive staff | |
Board of Trustees | College President shares revised Self-Study report with BOT for final approval at September 2024 meeting | |
Academic Senate | Steering Committee Co-Chairs provide updates on reaccreditation process at monthly meetings | |
Students | Through email and posters, students are directed to view the Self-Study report on the Accreditation webpage of College’s website | |
External audiences | Revised Self-Study report is posted on Accreditation webpage President’s vlog provides update on Self-Study and reaccreditation process Monthly social media posts continue to address reaccreditation process | |
MSCHE and Site Visit Evaluation Team | ALO sends Self-Study draft to Site Visit Team Chair at least two weeks before Team Chair’s initial site visit ALO sends final version of the Self-Study report and appendixes to MSCHE and the Site Visit Evaluation Team at least six weeks prior to site visit | |
Spring 2025 | Self-Study Steering Committee and Working Groups | Monthly meetings to prepare for site visit |
College community | College assemblies in January and March – Steering Committee Co-Chairs prepare college community for site visit later in the semester | |
Faculty | Adjunct dinner in January – Steering Committee Co-Chairs prepare faculty for site visit later in the semester | |
Board of Trustees | College President and ALO prepare BOT for site visit | |
College President and executive staff | ALO provides updates on reaccreditation process and prepares executive staff for site visit at weekly meetings | |
Academic Senate | Steering Committee Co-Chairs prepare faculty and staff for site visit | |
Students | Emails, Canvas banners, and other marketing materials invite students to participate in site visit | |
External audiences | President’s vlog and social media posts are used to invite the public to participate in site visit | |
MSCHE and Site Visit Evaluation Team | Site Visit Evaluation Teams comes to SCC to meet with various groups and provides initial feedback | |
Summer and Fall 2025 | Self-Study Steering Committee | Steering Committee meets to debrief self-study process |
College community | Campus Chronicle newsletters – present updates on reaccreditation status Opening college assembly in August – Steering Committee Co-Chairs present MSCHE’s action | |
External audiences | Update Accreditation webpage to reflect MSCHE’s action |
Several aspects of Salem Community College’s unique structure and setting should be considered when recruiting members for the MSCHE Visiting Team. Due to our proximity to and competitiveness with Delaware, no visiting members should be included from that state. Ideally, visiting team members should be from colleges similar to SCC in Maryland, New York, or Pennsylvania (west of Harrisburg). The College’s preference is that the Chair of the visiting team has experience working at a small rural community college campus. Members of the Evaluation Team must understand the financial landscape of community colleges.
Salem Community College has compiled a list of peer institutions using the College Scorecard.
The College will make use of Microsoft Teams and SharePoint to store evidentiary documents. Initial document identification will be the responsibility of the Working Groups, with additional materials identified during the Self-Study process. The Working Groups will be expected to use the Evidence Inventory Template to aid their discovery of appropriate evidence. All Working Group members will have access to evidence. Files are to be stored in a Microsoft Office format or as machine readable PDFs. Files will use a naming convention that references the associated Requirement of Affiliation or Standard and Criterion as well as the academic or calendar year or semester. File names will not include abbreviations and will be intuitively named.
Requirements of Affiliation | |
1. The institution is authorized or licensed to operate as a postsecondary educational institution and to award postsecondary degrees; it provides written documentation demonstrating both. Authorization or licensure is from an appropriate governmental organization or agency within the Middle States region (Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands), as well as by other agencies as required by each of the jurisdictions, regions, or countries in which the institution operates. Institutions that offer only postsecondary certificates, diplomas, or licenses are not eligible for accreditation by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education. | Institutional Compliance Review |
2. The institution is operational, with students actively enrolled in its degree programs. | Institutional Compliance Review |
3. For institutions pursuing Candidacy or Initial Accreditation, the institution will graduate at least one class before the evaluation team visit for initial accreditation takes place, unless the institution can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commission that the lack of graduates does not compromise its ability to demonstrate that students have achieved appropriate learning outcomes. | Institutional Compliance Review |
4. The institution’s representatives communicate with the Commission in English, both orally and in writing. | Institutional Compliance Review |
5. The institution complies with all applicable government (usually Federal and state) laws and regulations. | Institutional Compliance Review |
6. The institution complies with applicable Commission, interregional, and interinstitutional policies. These policies can be viewed on the Commission website, www.msche.org. | Institutional Compliance Review |
7. The institution has a mission statement and related goals, approved by its governing board, that defines its purposes within the context of higher education. | See Standard I evidence |
8. The institution systematically evaluates its educational and other programs and makes public how well and in what ways it is accomplishing its purposes. | See Standard III, IV, V, VII evidence |
9. The institution’s student learning programs and opportunities are characterized by rigor, coherence, and appropriate assessment of student achievement throughout the educational offerings, regardless of certificate or degree level or delivery and instructional modality. | See Standard III and V evidence |
10. Institutional planning integrates goals for academic and institutional effectiveness and improvement, student achievement of educational goals, student learning, and the results of academic and institutional assessments. | See Standard I, III, IV, V, and VII evidence |
11. The institution has documented financial resources, funding base, and plans for financial development, including those from any related entities (including without limitation systems, religious sponsorship, and corporate ownership) adequate to support its educational purposes and programs and to ensure financial stability. The institution demonstrates a record of responsible fiscal management, has a prepared budget for the current year, and undergoes an external financial audit on an annual basis. | See Standard VI evidence |
12. The institution fully discloses its legally constituted governance structure(s) including any related entities (including without limitation systems, religious sponsorship, and corporate ownership). The institution’s governing body is responsible for the quality and integrity of the institution and for ensuring that the institution’s mission is being accomplished. | See Standard VII evidence |
13. A majority of the institution’s governing body’s members have no employment, family, ownership, or other personal financial interest in the institution. The governing body adheres to a conflict-of-interest policy that assures that those interests are disclosed and that they do not interfere with the impartiality of governing body members or outweigh the greater duty to secure and ensure the academic and fiscal integrity of the institution. The institution’s district/system or other chief executive officer shall not serve as the chair of the governing body. | See Standard VII evidence |
14. The institution and its governing body/bodies make freely available to the Commission accurate, fair, and complete information on all aspects of the institution and its operations. The governing body/bodies ensure that the institution describes itself in comparable and consistent terms to all of its accrediting and regulatory agencies, communicates any changes in accredited status, and agrees to disclose information (including levels of governing body compensation, if any) required by the Commission to carry out its accrediting Responsibilities. | Institutional Compliance Review |
15. The institution has a core of faculty (fulltime or part-time) and/or other appropriate professionals with sufficient responsibility to the institution to assure the continuity and coherence of the institution’s educational Programs. | See Standard III evidence |
Standard I: Mission and Goals The institution’s mission defines its purpose within the context of higher education, the students it serves, and what it intends to accomplish. The institution’s stated goals are clearly linked to its mission and specify how the institution fulfills its mission. Criteria An accredited institution possesses and demonstrates the following attributes or activities: | |
1. clearly defined mission and goals that: a. are developed through appropriate collaborative participation by all who facilitate or are otherwise responsible for institutional development and improvement; b. address external as well as internal contexts and constituencies; c. are approved and supported by the governing body; d. guide faculty, administration, staff, and governing structures in making decisions related to planning, resource allocation, program and curricular development, and the definition of institutional and educational outcomes; e. include support of scholarly inquiry and creative activity, at levels and of the type appropriate to the institution; f. are publicized and widely known by the institution’s internal stakeholders; g. are periodically evaluated; | Strategic Planning documents College Assembly presentations Campus Chronicles communications BOT meeting minutes Website President’s vlog President’s Annual Report BOT meeting agendas President’s quarterly updates to SCC Foundation Board Board of Trustees’ minutes Master Planning Documents Administrative Unit Reviews Institutional Profiles Governance Committee Charges See Standard I evidence |
2. institutional goals that are realistic, appropriate to higher education, and consistent with mission; | Strategic Planning Documents Mission to Strategic Plan Crosswalk Strategic Goals to MSCHE Standards Crosswalk |
3. goals that focus on student learning and related outcomes and on institutional improvement; are supported by administrative, educational, and student support programs and services; and are consistent with institutional mission; and |
Student Learning Outcomes Handbook and Results Selected Unit Review Reports Selected Academic Program Assessment Reports Selected Student Learning Outcome Results |
4. periodic assessment of mission and goals to ensure they are relevant and achievable. | Strategic Plan Assessments Annual Report on Strategic Plan Process Institutional Research Survey and Report Schedule |
Standard II: Ethics and Integrity Ethics and integrity are central, indispensable, and defining hallmarks of effective higher education institutions. in all activities, whether internal or external, an institution must be faithful to its mission, honor its contracts and commitments, adhere to its policies, and represent itself truthfully. Criteria An accredited institution possesses and demonstrates the following attributes or activities: | |
1. a commitment to academic freedom, intellectual freedom, freedom of expression, and respect for intellectual property rights; | Association Contract College Catalog and Handbook Administrative Guidelines Intellectual Property Policy Use of Copyrighted Work Policy |
2. a climate that fosters respect among students, faculty, staff, and administration from a range of diverse backgrounds, ideas, and perspectives; | Sample Syllabus Diversity Statement and Hiring Procedures ADA Policies Human Resources Annual Trainings College Catalog/Handbook Title IX Documents Institutional Surveys (Revealing Institutional Strengths and Challenges, (Community College Survey of Student Engagement, ad-hoc surveys) |
3. a grievance policy that is documented and disseminated to address complaints or grievances raised by students, faculty, or staff. The institution’s policies and procedures are fair and impartial, and assure that grievances are addressed promptly, appropriately, and equitably; | Campus Climate Survey Student Grievance Process |
4. the avoidance of conflict of interest or the appearance of such conflict in all activities and among all constituents; | Recruitment Policies Performance Evaluation Documents Policy on Corrective Action, Discipline, and Termination Employee Achievement Programs Succession Plan Administrative Guidelines Faculty Promotion Policies Faculty Contracts Staff Contracts |
6. honesty and truthfulness in public relations announcements, advertisements, recruiting and admissions materials and practices, as well as in internal communications; | Campus Chronicles Board of Trustees Reports Marketing Documents Campus Security Report |
7. as appropriate to its mission, services or programs in place: a. to promote affordability and accessibility; b. to enable students to understand funding sources and options, value received for cost, and methods to make informed decisions about incurring debt; | Tuition Cost Documents Refund Policy Financial Aid Documents Scholarship Documents Disability Services Resources English and Math Placement Policies |
8. compliance with all applicable federal, state, and Commission reporting policies, regulations, and requirements to include reporting regarding: a. the full disclosure of information on institution-wide assessments, graduation, retention, certification and licensure or licensing board pass rates; b. the institution’s compliance with the Commission’s Requirements of Affiliation; c. substantive changes affecting institutional mission, goals, programs, operations, sites, and other material issues which must be disclosed in a timely and accurate fashion; d. the institution’s compliance with the Commission’s policies; and | Website (Student Right-to-Know) Annual Report OSHE (Office of the Secretary of Higher Education) Profile |
9. periodic assessment of ethics and integrity as evidenced in institutional policies, processes, practices, and the manner in which these are Implemented. | HR Trainings (Annual Compliance Policies, Discrimination Awareness in the Workplace, Sexual Harassment: Staff-to-Staff, Title IX and Sexual Misconduct) |
Standard III: Design and Delivery of the Student Learning Experience An institution provides students with learning experiences that are characterized by rigor and coherence at all program, certificate, and degree levels, regardless of instructional modality. All learning experiences, regardless of modality, program pace/schedule, level, and setting are consistent with higher education expectations. Criteria An accredited institution possesses and demonstrates the following attributes or activities: | |
1. certificate, undergraduate, graduate, and/or professional programs leading to a degree or other recognized higher education credential, of a length appropriate to the objectives of the degree or other credential, designed to foster a coherent student learning experience and to promote synthesis of learning; | College Catalog and Handbook Academic Program Review Template Curriculum Review Committee Minutes Academic Senate Minutes Perkins Outcomes Data List of Articulation Agreements Program Curriculum Sheets |
2. student learning experiences that are designed, delivered, and assessed by faculty (fulltime or part-time) and/or other appropriate professionals who are: a. rigorous and effective in teaching, assessment of student learning, scholarly inquiry, and service, as appropriate to the institution’s mission, goals, and policies; b. qualified for the positions they hold and the work they do; c. sufficient in number; d. provided with and utilize sufficient opportunities, resources, and support for professional growth and innovation; e. reviewed regularly and equitably based on written, disseminated, clear, and fair criteria, expectations, policies, and procedures; | Faculty and Adjunct Observation Forms Selected Academic Program Review Reports Student Learning Outcome Reports Faculty and Staff Recognition Awards Promotion and Tenure Procedures for Faculty Institutional Profile Qualification and Certifications Teaching and Learning Center Collateral Faculty and Adjunct Job Descriptions |
4. sufficient learning opportunities and resources to support both the institution’s programs of study and students’ academic progress; | Library Resources Disability Services Resources Academic Support Lab Resources Facilities (Labs, Studios, etc.) Early Alert (Dropout Detective) Information Perkins Grant Documents Nursing Clinical Site Agreements Select Questions from Institutional Surveys |
5. at institutions that offer undergraduate education, a general education program, free standing or integrated into academic disciplines, that: a. offers a sufficient scope to draw students into new areas of intellectual experience, expanding their cultural and global awareness and cultural sensitivity, and preparing them to make well-reasoned judgments outside as well as within their academic field; b. offers a curriculum designed so that students acquire and demonstrate essential skills including at least oral and written communication, scientific and quantitative reasoning, critical analysis and reasoning, technological competency, and information literacy. Consistent with mission, the general education program also includes the study of values, ethics, and diverse perspectives; and c. in non-US institutions that do not include general education, provides evidence that students can demonstrate general education skills; | College Catalog: General Education Learning Outcomes |
6. in institutions that offer graduate and professional education, opportunities for the development of research, scholarship, and independent thinking, provided by faculty and/or other professionals with credentials appropriate to graduate-level curricula; | Not applicable |
7. adequate and appropriate institutional review and approval on any student learning opportunities designed, delivered, or assessed by third-party providers; and | Not applicable |
8. periodic assessment of the effectiveness of programs providing student learning opportunities. | Selected Unit Review Reports Selected Academic Program Review Reports Selected Student Learning Outcome Reports |
Standard IV: Support of the Student Experience Across all educational experiences, settings, levels, and instructional modalities, the institution recruits and admits students whose interests, abilities, experiences, and goals are congruent with its mission and educational offerings. The institution commits to student retention, persistence, completion, and success through a coherent and effective support system sustained by qualified professionals, which enhances the quality of the learning environment, contributes to the educational experience, and fosters student success. Criteria An accredited institution possesses and demonstrates the following attributes or activities: | |
1. clearly stated, ethical policies and processes to admit, retain, and facilitate the success of students whose interests, abilities, experiences, and goals provide a reasonable expectation for success and are compatible with institutional mission, including: a. accurate and comprehensive information regarding expenses, financial aid, scholarships, grants, loans, repayment, and refunds; b. a process by which students who are not adequately prepared for study at the level for which they have been admitted are identified, placed, and supported in attaining appropriate educational goals; c. orientation, advisement, and counseling programs to enhance retention and guide students throughout their educational experience; d. processes designed to enhance the successful achievement of students’ educational goals including certificate and degree completion, transfer to other institutions, and post completion placement; | Strategic Enrollment Management Plans Admissions Policies Financial Aid Documents Selected Marketing Collateral Recruitment Documentation Retention Analysis Sample Degree Audits Course Descriptions from College Catalog and Handbooks Advising Documentation Graduation Requirements and Policy |
2. policies and procedures regarding evaluation and acceptance of transfer credits, and credits awarded through experiential learning, prior non-academic learning, competency-based assessment, and other alternative learning approaches; | Acceptance of Credits Policy Transfer Policy College Catalog and Handbook |
3. policies and procedures for the safe and secure maintenance and appropriate release of student information and records; | Veterans Affairs Policies Data Security Policies FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) Policies |
4. if offered, athletic, student life, and other extracurricular activities that are regulated by the same academic, fiscal, and administrative principles and procedures that govern all other programs; | College Catalog and Handbook Strategic Plans |
5. if applicable, adequate and appropriate institutional review and approval of student support services designed, delivered, or assessed by third-party providers; and | Not applicable |
6. periodic assessment of the effectiveness of programs supporting the student experience. | Selected Unit Reviews Retention Analysis Select Survey Results Grant Reporting |
Standard V: Educational Effectiveness Assessment Assessment of student learning and achievement demonstrates that the institution’s students have accomplished educational goals consistent with their program of study, degree level, the institution’s mission, and appropriate expectations for institutions of higher education. Criteria An accredited institution possesses and demonstrates the following attributes or activities: | |
1. clearly stated educational goals at the institution and degree/program levels, which are interrelated with one another, with relevant educational experiences, and with the institution’s mission; | Master Planning Documents Program Learning Outcomes listed in the College Catalog and Handbook Selected Course Learning Outcomes listed in Master Course Syllabi Selected Instructor Syllabi Addendums |
2. organized and systematic assessments, conducted by faculty and/or appropriate professionals, evaluating the extent of student achievement of institutional and degree/program goals. Institutions should: a. define meaningful curricular goals with defensible standards for evaluating whether students are achieving those goals; b. articulate how they prepare students in a manner consistent with their mission for successful careers, meaningful lives, and, where appropriate, further education. They should collect and provide data on the extent to which they are meeting these goals; c. support and sustain assessment of student achievement and communicate the results of this assessment to stakeholders; | Student Learning Outcomes Handbook Selected Student Learning Outcome Reports Selected Academic Program Review Reports Selected Official Course Descriptions Selected Instructor Syllabi Addendums Nursing Accreditation Reports Program and Course Learning Outcomes Mapped to Assignments Graduation Survey Alumni Survey |
3. consideration and use of assessment results for the improvement of educational effectiveness.
Consistent with the institution’s mission, such uses include some combination of the following: a. assisting students in improving their learning; b. improving pedagogy and curriculum; c. reviewing and revising academic programs and support services; d. planning, conducting, and supporting a range of professional development activities; e. planning and budgeting for the provision of academic programs and services; f. informing appropriate constituents about the institution and its programs; g. improving key indicators of student success, such as retention, graduation, transfer, and placement rates; h. implementing other processes and procedures designed to improve educational programs and services; | Placement Policy Assessments Selected Academic Program Review Reports Course Review or Revisions Teaching and Learning Center Collateral Student Affairs Initiatives (Retention, Transfer, and Placement) |
4. if applicable, adequate and appropriate institutional review and approval of assessment services designed, delivered, or assessed by third-party providers; and | Not applicable |
5. periodic assessment of the effectiveness of assessment processes utilized by the institution for the improvement of educational effectiveness. | Strategic Plans Select Student Learning Outcome reports Evaluation of Assessment Reports |
Standard VI: Planning, Resources, and Institutional Improvement The institution’s planning processes, resources, and structures are aligned with each other and are sufficient to fulfill its mission and goals, to continuously assess and improve its programs and services, and to respond effectively to opportunities and challenges. Criteria An accredited institution possesses and demonstrates the following attributes or activities: | |
1. institutional objectives, both institution- wide and for individual units, that are clearly stated, assessed appropriately, linked to mission and goal achievement, reflect conclusions drawn from assessment results, and are used for planning and resource allocation; | Master Planning Documents Strategic Plans Select Unit Review Reports |
2. clearly documented and communicated planning and improvement processes that provide for constituent participation, and incorporate the use of assessment results; | Board of Trustees Policies Budget Review Documents Budget Communications Strategic Plans |
3. a financial planning and budgeting process that is aligned with the institution’s mission and goals, evidence-based, and clearly linked to the institution’s and units’ strategic plans/objectives; | Budget Review Documents Budget Communications Strategic Plans |
4. fiscal and human resources as well as the physical and technical infrastructure adequate to support its operations wherever and however programs are delivered; | Master Planning Documents Organizational Charts |
5. well-defined decision-making processes and clear assignment of responsibility and accountability; | Organizational Charts |
6. comprehensive planning for facilities, infrastructure, and technology that includes consideration of sustainability and deferred maintenance and is linked to the institution’s strategic and financial planning processes; | Facilities Master Plan Technology Master Plan |
7. an annual independent audit confirming financial viability with evidence of follow-up on any concerns cited in the audit’s accompanying management letter; | Audits |
8. strategies to measure and assess the adequacy and efficient utilization of institutional resources required to support the institution’s mission and goals; and | Budget Review Documents |
9. periodic assessment of the effectiveness of planning, resource allocation, institutional renewal processes, and availability of Resources. | Budget Review Documents |
Standard VII: Governance, Leadership, and Administration The institution is governed and administered in a manner that allows it to realize its stated mission and goals in a way that effectively benefits the institution, its students, and the other constituencies it serves. Even when supported by or affiliated with governmental, corporate, religious, educational system, or other unaccredited organizations, the institution has education as its primary purpose, and it operates as an academic institution with appropriate autonomy. Criteria An accredited institution possesses and demonstrates the following attributes or activities: | |
1. a clearly articulated and transparent governance structure that outlines roles, responsibilities, and accountability for decision making by each constituency, including governing body, administration, faculty, staff and students; | Organizational Chart Board of Trustees Bylaws Bylaws of the Academic Senate Bylaws of Governance Committees |
2. a legally constituted governing body that: a. serves the public interest, ensures that the institution clearly states and fulfills its mission and goals, has fiduciary responsibility for the institution, and is ultimately accountable for the academic quality, planning, and fiscal well-being of the institution; b. has sufficient independence and expertise to ensure the integrity of the institution. Members must have primary responsibility to the accredited institution and not allow political, financial, or other influences to interfere with their governing responsibilities; c. ensures that neither the governing body nor its individual members interferes in the day-to-day operations of the institution; d. oversees at the policy level the quality of teaching and learning, the approval of degree programs and the awarding of degrees, the establishment of personnel policies and procedures, the approval of policies and by-laws, and the assurance of strong fiscal management; e. plays a basic policy-making role in financial affairs to ensure integrity and strong financial management. This may include a timely review of audited financial statements and/or other documents related to the fiscal viability of the institution; f. appoints and regularly evaluates the performance of the Chief Executive Officer; g. is informed in all its operations by principles of good practice in board governance; h. establishes and complies with a written conflict of interest policy designed to ensure the impartiality of the governing body by addressing matters such as payment for services, contractual relationships, employment, and family, financial or other interests that could pose or be perceived as conflicts of interest; i. supports the Chief Executive Officer in maintaining the autonomy of the institution; | Board of Trustees Policies |
3. Chief Executive Officer who: a. is appointed by, evaluated by, and reports to the governing body and shall not chair the governing body; b. has appropriate credentials and professional experience consistent with the mission of the organization; c. has the authority and autonomy required to fulfill the responsibilities of the position, including developing and implementing institutional plans, staffing the organization, identifying and allocating resources, and directing the institution toward attaining the goals and objectives set forth in its mission; d. has the assistance of qualified administrators, sufficient in number, to enable the Chief Executive Officer to discharge his/her duties effectively; and is responsible for establishing procedures for assessing the organization’s efficiency and effectiveness; | Organizational Charts Board of Trustee Meeting Minutes Strategic Plans CV of the President President Speeches, Presentations, vlogs Job description of the President |
4. an administration possessing or demonstrating: a. an organizational structure that is clearly documented and that clearly defines reporting relationships; b. an appropriate size and with relevant experience to assist the Chief Executive Officer in fulfilling his/her roles and responsibilities; c. members with credentials and professional experience consistent with the mission of the organization and their functional roles; d. skills, time, assistance, technology, and information systems expertise required to perform their duties; e. regular engagement with faculty and students in advancing the institution’s goals and objectives; f. systematic procedures for evaluating administrative units and for using assessment data to enhance operations; and | Organizational Charts Select CVs of Administrators |
5. periodic assessment of the effectiveness of governance, leadership, and administration. | BOT Assessments Staff Evaluations President’s Evaluation |
- 2014-2015 Self-Study Design
- 2014-2015 Self-Study Research Questions
- 2014-2015 Final Self Study
- 2014-2015 Self Recommendations
- 2016 Final Team Report
- Salem Community College Accreditation Page on MSCHE
- Salem Community College Statement of Accreditation Page [PDF, printed on 01/04/2023]
- Standards for Accreditation and Requirements of Affiliation [PDF]
- MSCHE Self-Study Guide
- Verification of Compliance with Accreditation-Relevant Federal Regulations [PDF]
- Institutional Federal Compliance Report [DOCX]